# Full text of "Observational constraints on modified gravity models and the Poincaré dodecahedral topology"

## See other formats

Observational constraints on modified gravity models and the Poincare dodecahedral topology M.C. Bento,i'E| O. Bcrtolami,i'|3 M.J. RebouQas,2^[l and N.M.C. Santos^^l ^ Departamento de Fisica, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Avemda Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal Centra Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil ^Institut fiir Theoretische Physik, Universitdt Heidelberg Philosophenweg 16, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (Dated: February 5, 2008) We study observational constraints on models that account for the accelerated expansion of the universe via infrared modifications to general relativity, namely the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati braneworld model as well as the Dvali- Turner and Cardassian models. We find that significant constraints can be placed on the parameters of each model using type la supernovae data together with the baryon acoustic peak in the large scale correlation function of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey of luminous red galaxies and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation shift parameter data. Moreover, by considering the Poincare dodecahedral space as the circles-in-the-sky observable spa- tial topology, we show that the detection of a such a non-trivial topology would provide relevant additional constraints, particularly on the curvature parameter, for all models. PACS numbers: 98.80.-k, 98.80.Es, 98.80.Jk, 95.36.+X I. INTRODUCTION Models where gravity is modified by soft very long- range corrections, normally inspired in braneworld con- structions, are an interesting approach to account for the recent accelerated expansion of the universe, with no need for dark energy. One of the simplest co- variant modified-gravity models is based on the Dvali- Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) braneworld model pj, as gen- eralized to cosmology by Deffayet j2|. In this model, gravity is altered at large distances by the slow leakage of gravity off our 4-dimensional brane universe into the 5-dimensional bulk spacetime, leading to a modification of the Friedmann equation in a cosmological context. At small scales, gravity becomes effectively bound to the brane and 4D gravity is recovered to a good approxima- tion. Crucially for our purposes, it was shown by Deffayet that the model exhibits cosmological solutions with a self- accelerating phase at late times. An interesting variation of this proposal has been suggested by Dvali and Turner (hereafter referred to as DT model). Another possibil- ity, also originally motivated by extra dimensions physics, is the modification of the Friedmann equation by the in- troduction of an additional nonlinear term proportional 'Electronic address: bento@sirius.ist.utl.pt Also at Centro de Fi'sica Teorica de Parti'culas, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Avenida Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa TElectronic address: orfeu@cosmos.ist. utl.ptl "'"Electronic address: reboucas@cbpf. br| 5 Electronic address: n.santos@thphy s.uni-heidelberg.de| to p", the so-called Cardassian model ■ We analyze current constraints on the parameters of these models, as provided by the so-called gold sam- ple of 157 type la supernovae (SNe la) ^j, as well as the baryon oscillation acoustic peak (BAO) in the large scale correlation function of the Sloan Digital Sky Sur- vey (SDSS) 7] and the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) shift parameter Q. We consider a non-fiat prior. Notice that joint SNe-CMBR-BAO con- straints have already been considered for the ACDM and quintessence models in Ref. and for an f(R) modified gravity model in piil |. While this work was in progress, the corresponding analysis for the DGP model has ap- peared, see Ref. [llj, where the authors conclude that both fiat DGP and ACDM models are within the 1 sigma contour, but the latter provides a better fit to the data. In what concerns the DT and Cardassian models, con- straints from supernovae data alone have previously been studied, see |[12j and references therein. Likewise for dark energy models, one expects the pa- rameters of modified gravity models to be affected by the geometry of the universe. The description of the universe as a metrical manifold, requires the characteri- zation of its geometry and its topology; hence, a key is- sue regarding our understanding of the universe concerns its 3-dimensional geometry and topology. Studies of the CMBR such as the ones performed by the Wilkinson Mi- crowave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) allow for testing ge- ometry, which is related with the intrinsic curvature of ^ Other braneworld models could also be considered, e.g. the model proposed in Ref. 5|. 2 the 3-dimensional space. On the other hand, topology concerns global properties of space such as its shape and size and, clearly, 3-geonietry restricts but does not de- termine the topology of its spatial section. However, in a locally spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe, the topology of its spatial sections determines the sign of its local curvature and therefore dictates its geometry. Different strategies and methodologies have been de- vised to probe a putative non-trivial topology of the spa- tial sections of the universe (see, e.g. Refs. fT3, Ts^ for reviews and details on cosmic crystallographic methods) . For instance, the so-called circles-in-the-sky method, is based on the presence of multiple images of correlated circles in the CMBR maps . In a space with a detect- able non-trivial topology, the last scattering sphere (LSS) intersects some of its topological images along pairs of cir- cles of equal radii, centered at different points on the LSS, with the same distribution of temperature fluctuations, ST. These pairs of matching circles will be imprinted on the CMBR anisotropy sky maps regardless of the back- ground geometry or detectable topology 0,01 ■ Hence, it follows that in order to probe observationally a non- trivial topology, one should examine the full-sky CMBR maps in order to extract the correlated circles, and use their angular radii and the relative position of their cen- ters to probe a putative non-trivial topology of the spatial sections of the observable universe. In particular, it has been shown that the Poincarc do- decahedral space topology (see Section IV. A) accounts for the low value of the CMBR quadrupole and octopole moments measured by first year WMAP data , which has been confirmed by the most recent WMAP data anal- ysis 10], and fits the temperature two-point correlation function |2ll |23 | . Recently, the Poincare dodecahe- dral space |22'|, through the circles-in-the-sky method, has been considered as the observable spatial topology of the universe in order to reanalyze the current SNe la plus X-ray gas mass fraction constraints on the density parameters of matter (flm) and dark energy (Qa) in the context of the ACDM model with the result that it considerably reduces degeneracies. The circles-in-the- sky method has also been used to place constraints on the parameters of the generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) model mm El, as discussed in Ref. ^J. In that work, by using both the Poincare dodecahedral and binary oc- tahedral topologies, it has been shown that these spatial topologies through circles-in-the-sky could provide addi- tional constraints on the As parameter of the GCG model as allowed by the SNe la observations. Given these encouraging results it is natural to use this strategy to constrain the parameters of modified gravity models as well. To this end, we will consider the Poincarc dodecahedral space topology to reanalyze current con- straints on the parameters of the DGP, DT and Cardas- sian models, in a joint analysis with the observational constraints mentioned above, namely the gold sample of SNe la, as well as the baryon oscillation acoustic peak in the large scale correlation function of the SDSS and the CMBR shift parameter. II. MODIFIED-GRAVITY MODELS Modified gravity models explore the possibility that there is no dark energy, and consider instead that in- frared modifications to general relativity exist on very large scales, accounting in this way for the observed late time acceleration of the universe. A. Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model One of the simplest covariant modified-gravity models is based on the DGP braneworld model 1], as generalized in Ref. to a FLRW brane in a Minkowski bulk. In the DGP model, standard model gauge fields are confined to a (3-|-l)D brane residing in an non-compact (4+l)D bulk, with different scales of gravity on the brane and in the bulk. The gravitational part of the action is given by S = Ml d X dw (1) where M5 denotes de 5D Planck mass, Mpi is the 4D Planck mass, g'^' is the trace of the 5D metric {A,B = 0, 1, 2, 4), w is the extra spatial coordinate, g the trace of the 4D metric induced in the brane, gf_iv{x) = gllJ{x,w = 0), and where i?5, R4 are the 5D and 4D scalar curvatures, respectively. This gravita- tional action coupled to matter on the brane leads to a modified Friedmann equation, which can be written as (2) where 2M| (3) is a length scale beyond which gravity starts to leak out into the bulk. Rewriting the above equation in dimensionless vari- ables = Px/Pcrit with Peril = 3 Mpi Hq/8tt and the energy density in the component x today, we get H (4) where Hq is the Hubble expansion parameter today and z is the redshift, and we have taken into account that, at present, the universe is matter dominated, hence p ~ 3 Pra- Moreover, fJ^ = — t^t^- is the present curvature parameter and 1 (5) The constraint equation between the various compo- nents of energy density at z = is then given by = 1 (6) It has been shown that the observed recent acceleration of the universe can be obtained from the extra contribution to the Friedmann equation by setting the length scale close to the horizon size |28| |29|1 . B. Dvali- Turner model Inspired in the above construction, Dvali and Turner considered a more generic modification of the Friedmann equation hereafter referred to as DT model k 1 2-/9 0/2 (7) Notice that (3 is the only parameter of the model: the case /3 — 1 corresponds to the DGP model, /3 — to the cosmological constant case, and = 2 to a "renormal- ization" of the Friedmann equation. A stringent bound follows from requiring that the new term does not inter- fere with the formation of large-scale structure, /3 < 1, whereas the successful predictions of Big-Bang nucle- osynthesis impose a weaker limit on /3, namely, (3 < 1.95. Moreover, it can be shown that this correction behaves like dark energy in the recent past, with equation of state Weff = —1 + /3/2, and w = —1 in the distant future; moreover, it can mimic w < —1 without violating the weak-energy condition 3]. The expression for the Hubble expansion as a function of redshift is then /3/2 where flr^ is now generalized to (8) (9) which means that the constraint between the various den- sities at 2; = is given by fi™ + rife + 2Jn7(i - rjfe)'^/2 ^ ^ (10) C. Cardassian model We will also consider the so called Cardassian model 3 , which explains the current acceleration of the universe by a modification of the Friedmann equation consisting basically in the introduction of an additional term proportional to p" Stt , , „, k — (p-f 6p")- — 3A/, PI (11) where h and n are constants, and we have added a cur- vature term to the original Cardassian model. As in the previous cases, in this model the universe is composed only of radiation and matter (including baryon and cold dark matter) and the energy density required to close the universe is much smaller than in standard cosmology, so that matter can be sufficient to provide a flat (or close to flat) geometry. For n < 1 the second term becomes important if z < 0(1); thereon it dominates the Friedmann equation and yields a oc ^2/3n fQj. ordinary matter, so acceleration will occur if n < 2/3. There are two main motivations for the introduction of the extra term, namely terms of that form typically when the universe is embedded as a three-dimensional surface (3-brane) in higher dimen- sions _30J or, alternatively, it may appear in a purely 4D theory due to an extra contribution to the total energy density as would be the case if there were some unknown interactions between matter particles 31]. In a matter dominated universe, Eq. (|ll|l can be rewrit- ten as -^) =r!™(i + z)3 + i7fe(i + z)2 +{i-n,^-nk){i + z) 3n (12) Notice that the case n — Q corresponds to the ACDM model. Finally, it is worth pointing out that these models have been thoroughly scrutinized from the observational point of view using constraints from CMBR, SNe la and large scale structure. For recent studies see, for instance, Refs. llLJ^,^^^^,^^^^]. III. OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS A. Constraints from SNe la For our analysis, we consider the set of SNe la data re- cently compiled by Riess et al. ^ known as the gold sam- ple. This set contains 157 points: 143 points taken from the 230 Tonry et al. ji^l data plus 23 points from Barris et al. |41,J and 14 points discovered using HST 0. Vari- ous points where the classiflcation of the supernovae was uncertain or the photometry was incomplete have been discarded, thus increasing the reliability of the sample. 4 The data points in the gold sample are given in terms of the distance modulus fJ-ohsiz) = m{z) - Mohsiz) , (13) and the respective errors (T^^i,^ (z), which already take into account the effects of peculiar motions. The apparent magnitude m is related to the dimensionless luminosity distance Z?i(z) = i^5(y(z)) , (14) where S{x) = (sin(a;), sinh(a;), x) for < 0, fi^ > and Ofe = 0, respectively, by m(z) = M + 5logi„D l{z) We have defined a new function Ho y{z) = ^TT^I The is calculated from H{z') dz' (15) (16) E Mobs(^:») -M' - 5 login -PLth(g»;«») 1 2 (17) where M' = A4 — Afobs is a nuisance parameter, are the model parameters and Dnhiz; ai) is the theoretical prediction for the dimensionless luminosity distance de- termined using the modified Friedmann equations. B. Constraints from the SDSS baryon acoustic oscillations In order to further remove degeneracies intrinsic to the distance fitting methods, it is interesting to consider also the effect of the baryon acoustic peak of the large scale correlation function at 100/i~^ Mpc separation, detected by the SDSS team using a sample of LRG (Tj] . The posi- tion of the acoustic peak is related to the quantity A Ho H{zirg) 1/3 Zlrg S {y{zirg)) 2/3 (18) which takes the value Ao — 0.469 ± 0.017, and where Zlrg = 0.35 0. We have neglected the weak dependence of Ao on the spectral tilt. The baryon acoustic peak is taken into account by adding the term 2 ^ / \sdss A (19) to the x^, where a a is the error of ^o- FIG. 1: A schematic illustration of two antipodal match- ing circles in the LSS. These pair of circles come about in all globally homogeneous positively curved manifolds with a circles-in-the-sky detectable topology. The relation be- tween the angular radius 7, angular sides Vinj and Xisa is given by the following Napier's rule for spherical triangles, cos 7 = tan Tinj cot Xlas ■ We should point out that there is a level of uncer- tainty in the measurement of A due to uncertainties es- sentially on rim (notice that uncertainties on the baryon density Sib are constrained by the CMBR and Big Bang nucleosynthesis to be smaller than about 2%). Also, one should notice that the baryon acoustic oscillations were analyzed using a fiducial ACDM model and the full data set was compressed to a constraint at a single redshift Q . As pointed out by Dick et al |42|, the reduction of the data was intended to be valid for the case of a ACDM model and robust for models with a constant equation of state, but may give rise to significant systematic errors for the models we are considering. Although a reanaly- sis of the baryon oscillation data in the context of these models would no doubt be desirable, one may argue that substantial changes are not to be expected given that the modifications of gravity we are considering are supposed to alter general relativity only at the Gpc scale. The same can be said about topology given that it affects only the low modes of the CMBR spectrum. C. Constraints from the CMBR shift parameter It is expected that when the cosmological parameters are varied, there is a shift in the whole CMBR angular spectrum, that is ^ TZ£, with the shift parameter TZ 5 Model Parameters SN SN+BAO SN+BAO+CMBR SN+BAO+CMBR+T 0.46 0.28 0.28 0.29 ACDM -0.44 0.033 -0.003 -0.020 181.24 183.76 183.93 184.44 0.33 0.27 0.27 0.28 DGP -0.56 -0.32 0.014 -0.021 181.36 182.04 190.53 192.34 13 -10 1.0 0.26 0.23 DT 0.49 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.032 -0.32 -0.002 -0.02 x' 180.55 182.04 183.54 184.11 n -6.15 0.33 0.042 0.041 Card 0.33 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.33 -0.76 -0.003 -0.020 x' 178.77 182.08 183.72 184.23 TABLE I: Best fit parameters for the ACDM, DGP, DT and Cardassian models for different combinations of observational constraints (SN = SNe la gold sample, BAO = SDSS baryon acoustic oscillations, CMBR = CMBR shift parameter and T =Poincare dodecahedral space topology for 7 = 50° ±6°). being given by (20) where zi^s = 1089 18]. The results from CMBR (WMAP, CBI, ACBAR) data correspond to 7^n = 1.716 ± 0.062 (using results from Spergel et al. J^). We include the CMBR data in our analysis by adding 2 I'Uo-n (21) to the total function, where TZ is computed for each model using Eq. (|20|) . IV. COSMIC TOPOLOGY IN BRANE COSMOLOGY In the framework of standard Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson- Walker (FLRW) cosmology, the universe is described by a space-time manifold which is decom- posed into A^4 = M X M3 and endowed with a locally (spatially) homogeneous and isotropic metric dr'^ 1 — kr^ '■{de^ (22) where, depending on the sign of the constant spatial curvature fc, the geometry of the 3-space M3 is either Euclidean (fc = 0), spherical (fc = 1), or hyperbolic Thus, since our 3-dimensional space M3 is chosen to be one of the following simply-connected spaces, Euclidean M."^, spherical S'^, or hyperbolic space H'^, depending on the sign of the constant spatial curvature fc, it is a com- mon misconception that the Gaussian curvature k of M3 is all one needs to establish whether the 3~space where we live in is finite or not. However, it is known that the great majority of constant curvature 3-spaces, M3, are multiply-connected quotient manifolds of the form R'^/F, S'^/F, and H'^/F, where F is a fixed-point free group of isometrics of the corresponding covering space. Thus, for example, for the Euclidean geometry besides R'^ there are 6 classes of topologically distinct compact and orientable spaces M3 that can be endowed with this geometry, while for both the spherical and hyperbolic geometries there is an infinite number of non-homeomorphic (topologically inequivalent) manifolds with non-trivial topology that admit these geometries. On the other hand, since the ultimate spatial topology has not yet been determined by cosmological observations, our 3-dimensional space may be any of these possible quotient manifolds. Quotient manifolds are compact in three independent directions, or compact in two or at least one independent direction. In compact manifolds, any two given points may be joined by more than one geodesic. Since the ra- diation emitted by cosmic sources follows geodesies, the immediate observational consequence of a nontrivial de- tectable spatial non-trivial topology^ of M3 is that there will be multiple images of either cosmic objects or specific spots on the CMBR. At very large scales, the existence of these multiple images (or pattern repetitions) is a physi- cal effect that can be used to probe the 3-space topology. ^ The extent to whi ch a non-trivial topology may be detected was discussed in Refs. l43l. 6 0.25 0.3 a -0.01 - -0.02 -0.03 - -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 ^ -0.08 - -0.09 0.15 FIG. 2: Confidence contours (68.3%, 95.4% and 99.7%) in tiie - ilk plane for tlie ACDM (left) and DGP (riglit) models obtained with the SNe la gold sample plus the SDSS acoustic peak data and CMBR shift parameter (dashed lines). Also shown are the contours obtained assuming in addition a D space topology with 7 — 50° ± 6° (full). In 5D braneworld models, the universe is described by a 5-dimensional metrical orbifold (bulk) O5 that is mir- ror symmetric (Z2) across the 4D brane (manifold) A44. Thus, the bulk can be decomposed as O5 = M4 x Ei ~ R X M3 X El, where Ei is a Z2 symmetric Euclidean space, and where is endowed with a Robertson- Walker metric Eq. (|22|l . which is recovered when w — for the extra non-compact dimension. In this way, the multiplicity of possible inequivalent topologies of our 3- dimensional space, and the physical consequences of a non-trivial detectable topology of M3 (possible multiple images of discrete cosmic sources, circle-in-the-sky on the LSS) is brought on the braneworld scenario. A. Poincare Dodecahedral Space Topology The Poincare dodecahedral space I? is a 3-manifold of the form S^/F in which F = /* is the binary icosahe- dral group of order 120. It is represented by a regular spherical dodecahedron (12 pentagonal faces) along with the identification of the opposite faces after a twist of 36°. Such a space is positively curved (k=l, < 0), and tiles the 3-sphere S"^ into 120 identical spherical dodecahedra. The observed values of the power measured by WMAP of the CMBR quadrupole {£ = 2) and octopole {£ = 3) moments, and the sign of the curvature density fifc = -0.02 ± 0.02 reported by first year WMAP data anal- ysis team il8|, which has been reinforced by the three- year WMAP observations (cf. Table 11 of Ref. fl^). have motivated the suggestion of the Poincare dodecahe- dral space topology as an explanation for this observed large-angle anomaly in the CMB power spectrum [2^ . This observation has sparked the interest in the dodec- ahedral space, which has been examined on its various features El El El El ■ In particular, it turns out that a universe with the Poincare dodecahedral space section squares with WMAP data in that it accounts for the suppression of power at large angle observed by WMAP [3 Ell, and fits the WMAP temperature two- point correlation function [Hl^, retaining the standard FLRW background for local physics. Notice however that a preliminary search of the antipodal matched circles in the WMAP sky maps predicted by the Poincare model has failed |4J|. A second search of the correlated cir- cles for the "D space was not conclusive either 47J . This absence of evidence of correlated circles may be due to several causes, such as the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, lens- ing and the finite thickness of the LSS, as well as possible systematics in the removal of the foregrounds, which can damage the topological circle matching. Thus, it is con- ceivable that the correlated circles ma y h ave been over- looked in the CMBR sky maps search |23| • Regarding the compatibility of the Poincare dodecahe- dral space topology with string theory, it has been shown that, on account of the Adams-Polchinski-Silverstein con- jecture on the instability of non-supersymmetric AdS orbifold, the Poincare dodecahedral space topology can- not arise as a model for the spatial sections of acceler- ating braneworld cosmological models in the framework of string theory However, while the braneworld paradigm has often been referred to as string-inspired, the models we are considering are not committed to that premise. B. The Circles-in-the-Sky Method An important class of constant curvature positively- curved 3-spaces with a non-trivial topology is comprised by the globally homogeneous manifolds. These manifolds satisfy the topological principle of (global) homogeneity, in the sense that all points in M3 are topologically equiv- alent. In particular, in these spaces the pairs of matching 7 circles will be antipodal, as shown in Figure ^ The Poincare dodecahedral space T) is globally homo- geneous, and give rise to six pairs of antipodal matched circles on the LSS, centered in a symmetrical pattern as the centers of the faces of the dodecahedron. Figure Q] shows a pair of these antipodal circles. Clearly the dis- tance between the centers of each pair of these correlated circles is twice the radius r.inj of the sphere inscribed in V. It then follows from the use of trigonometric relations (known as Napier's rules) for the right-angled spherical triangle shown in Fig. Ogives origin to a relation between the angular radius 7, the angular sides and radius Xigg of the LSS, namely Xiss ^ tan" tan r. cos 7 (23) Eq. (|24() makes apparent that Xiss depends on the cosmo- logical scenario. Moreover, Eq. H23|l with Xiss given by Eq. (|24|l together with the ratio Hq /H for each modified- gravity model yield a relation between the angular radius 7 and the cosmological parameters of each model. Thus, they can be used to set bounds (confidence regions) on model parameters. To quantify this, we consider a typ- ical angular radius 7 — 50° estimated in Ref. |23| for the Poincare dodecahedral space and, since the measure- ments of the radius 7 do involve observational uncertain- ties on the model parameters from the detection of the spatial topology, we take into account these uncertain- ties; in order to obtain conservative results, we consider 57 ~ 6°, which is the scale below which the circles are blurred for the Poincare dodecahedral space case [20|| . where rinj is a topological invariant, equal to tt/IO for the the space V, and the distance Xiss to the origin is given by Xiss = y{ziss) (24) 8 0.2 0.4 -0.01 -0.02 -0.03 -0.04 a" -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 -0.08 -0.09 -0.1 FIG. 4: Confidence contours (68.3%, 95.4% and 99.7%) for the Cardassian model, in the flm — n (top) and Qk ~ n (bottom) planes, obtained with the SN -l-BAO + CMB data (left) and including also a V space topology with 7 — 50° ± 6° (right). Slfc or are fixed at the value that minimizes the x^- C. Constraints from cosmic topology The effect of cosmic topology is taken into account by adding a new term to the a-s Xtop Xls Xi th (25) The value of xiss is given by Eq. H24|l and the uncertainty '^xiss comes from the uncertainty 6^ of the circles-in-the- sky method. The theoretical value of xiss for each model is obtained from xiss = y{ziss) combined with the respec- tive expansion law. V. RESULTS We have performed a best fit analysis with the mini- mization of the total x^, 2 2,2 X ^XSN+Xsds X^ , (26) for the modified gravity models mentioned above using a MINUIT ,4^] based code. Notice that we marginalize analytically over A4' and that we allow the parameters P and n to vary in the interval ] — 10, 1 ] and ] — 10, 2/3 [ , respectively. In the cases where topology is taken into account, we use the prior flk < since the Poincare dodecahedral space is positively curved. Our results are summarized in Tabled In Fig. El we show the 1, 2 and 3 cr confidence con- tours in the fim — plane for the ACDM (left) and DGP (right) models obtained using the SNe la gold sam- ple, SDSS acoustic peak and CMBR shift parameter data (dashed lines). We also show the contours obtained as- suming a V space topology with 7 = 50° ± 6° (full lines). This figure together with Table |l] shows that the best- fit DGP model is slightly open whereas the the best-fit ACDM model is slightly closed. Notice also that the ef- fect of the CMBR shift parameter is to push the best fit values for Qk towards a flat universe, as first pointed out in Ref. j^J, while the SDSS baryon oscillation data constrains basically flm, in agreement previous works m El H m. Moreover, we see that the effect of in- cluding the topology constraint leads to a reduction of degeneracies, particularly relevant for the curvature pa- 9 rameter, flk- Our results for the DT and Cardassian models are shown in Figs.|21and01both with and without the topol- ogy constraint. The SNe+CMBR+BAO constraints lead to best-fit models that are, in both cases, closer to flat than the best-fit DGP model and closed spaces are pre- ferred. Constraints on Qm are similar for all models. The effect of topology is, for these models, again clearly im- portant regarding the curvature parameter, flk, and does not affect significantly the remaining parameters. FIG. 5: Lines of constant angular radius, 7, in the Qk — plane for the DGP (solid) and ACDM (dashed) models. In Fig. Owe show how our results regarding the DGP and ACDM models depend on the angular radius of the circles, 7. This figure displays the lines of constant 7 in the flk — plane for these models. We see that when the angular radius increases Qk becomes more negative and that, for any given value of the angular radius, the ACDM model prefers a less curved universe as compared with the DGP model. It is also clear that the bounds of topological origin on flk are expected to be very similar for both models, for any given angular radius in the inter- val 60° < 7 < 10°; however, for 7 > 70° the distinction between these bounds for the ACDM and DGP mod- els becomes more important. Finally, this figure shows that the detection of circles predicted by the V topology restricts substantially the range for ilk , regardless of the angular radius 7. Clearly additional limits on this density parameter will arise for a specific value for 7 and related uncertainty S'y. We find that, although the best fit for flk changes for different values of the angular radius, 7, this dependence is not very strong (see Fig. O . For instance, if we assume a smaller value for 7, e.g. 7 = 11° ± 1°, as suggested in Ref. i the allowed regions will be shifted slightly towards values of flk closer to 0. On the other hand, changes in the uncertainty of the angular radius alter the area corresponding to the confidence regions. VI. CONCLUSIONS We have analyzed observational constraints on models that account for the accelerated expansion of the universe that account for the accelerated expansion of the universe via long-range corrections to the Friedmann equation, namely the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati braneworld model as well as the Dvali- Turner and Cardassian models. Us- ing type la supernovae data together with the baryon acoustic peak in the large scale correlation function of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey of luminous red galaxies and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation shift parameter data, we find that significant constraints can be placed on the parameters of these models. In general relativity, as well as in any metrical theory of gravitation of some generality and scope, a common approach to cosmological modeling commences with a space-time manifold endowed with a Lorentzian metric. The metrical approach to modeling the physical world has often led physicists to restrict their studies to the purely geometric features of space-time, either by ignor- ing the role of spatial topology or by considering just the simply-connected topological alternatives. However, since the topological properties of a manifold are more fundamental than its metrical features, it is important to determine to what extent physical results related to a FLRW universe are constrained by the topology of its spatial section. The so-called circles-in-the-sky method makes appar- ent that a non-trivial detectable topology of the spatial section of the universe is an observable attribute, and can be probed for any locally spatially homogeneous and isotropic space. By assuming the Poincare dodecahedral space T> as the circles-in-the-sky detected topology of the spatial sections of the universe, we have re-analyzed the joint SNe-|-CMBR-|-BAO constraints on the abovemen- tioned models. The main outcome of our analysis is that the detection of a non-trivial spatial topology of the Uni- verse through the circles-in-the-sky method would give rise to additional constraints on the curvature parameter for the models we have considered. Acknowledgments M.J.R thanks CNPq for the grant under which this work was carried out, and is grateful to J.S. Alcaniz for useful discussions. The work of M.C.B. and O. B. was supported by Fundagao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) under the grant POCI/FIS/56093/2004. [1] G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze G, and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. [2] C. Deffayet, Phys. Lett. B 502 199 (2001); B 485 208 (2000). 10 [3] G. Dvali and M.S. Turner, astro-ph/0301510 [4] K. Freese and M. Lewis, Phys. Lett. B 540, 1 (2002). [5] V. Sahni and Y. Shtanov, JCAP 0311, 014 (2003). [6] A.G. Riess et aL [Supernova Search Team Collaboration], Astrophys. J. 607, 665 (2004). [7] D. Eisenstein et al, Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005). [8] J. R. Bond, G. Efstathiou, M. Tegmark, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc, 291, L33 (1997); A. Melchiorri, L. Mersini- Houghton, C. J. Odman and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D 68, 043509 (2003). [9] K. Ichikawa and T. Takahashi, arXiv:astro-ph/0511821 [10] M. Amarzguioui, O. Elgaroy, D. F. Mota and T. Multa- maki, arXiv:astro-ph/0510519 [11] R. Maartens and E. Majerotto, astro-ph/0603353' [12] M.C. Bento, O.Bertolami, N.M.C. Santos, and A.A.Sen, Phys. Rev. D 71, 063501 (2005). [13] I.N. Bernshtein and V.F.Shvartsman, Sov. Phys. JETP 52, 814 (1980). [14] M. Lachieze-Rey and J.P. Luminet, Phys. Rep. 254, 135 (1995); G.D. Starkman, Class. Quantum Grav. 15, 2529 (1998); J. Levin, Phys. Rep. 365, 251 (2002); M.J. Re- bouga s and G.I. Gomero, Braz. J. Phys. 34, 1358 (2004), "astro-ph/0402324 M.J. Rebougas, astro-ph/0504365 [15] R. Lehoucq, M. Lachieze-Rey, and J.P. Luminet, Astron. Astrophys. 313, 339 (1996); B.F. Roukema, Class. Quan- tum Grav. 15, 2645 (1998); R. Lehoucq, J.P. Luminet, and J.P. Uzan, Astron. Astrophys. 344, 735 (1999); H.V. Fagundes and E. Gausmann, Phys. Lett. A 238, 235 (1998); J.P. Uzan, R. Lehoucq and J.P. Luminet, As- tron. Astrophys. 351, 766 (1999); G.I. Gomero, M.J. Re- bougas, and A.F.F. Teixeira, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 9, 687 (2000); R. Lehoucq, J.P. Uzan, and J.P Luminet, Astron. Astrophys. 363, 1 (2000); G.I. Gomero, M.J. Rebougas, and A.F.F. Teixeira, Phys. Lett. A 275, 355 (2000); G.I. Gomero, M.J. Rebougas, and A.F.F. Teixeira, Class. Quantum Grav. 18, 1885 (2001); G.I. Gomero, A.F.F. Teixeira, M.J. Rebougas and A. Bernui, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, 869 (2002); A. Marecki, B. Roukema, and S. Bajtlik, Astron. Astrophys. 435, 427 (2005). [16] N.J. Cornish, D. Spergel, and G. D. Starkman, Class. Quantum Grav. 15, 2657 (1998). [17] M.O. Calvao, G.I. Gomero, B. Mota, and M.J. Rebougas, Class. Quantum Grav. 22 1991 (2005). [18] D.N. Spergel et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 175 (2003). [19] D.N. Spergel et al., astro-ph/0603449 [20] R. Aurich, S. Lustig, and F. Steiner, Class. Quantum Grav. 22, 2061 (2005). [21] R. Aurich, S. Lustig, and F. Steiner, Class. Quantum Grav. 22, 3443 (2005). [22] J.P. Luminet, J. Weeks, A. Riazuelo, R. Lehoucq, and J.P. Uzan, Nature 425, 593 (2003). [23] M.J. Rebougas, J.S. Alcaniz, B. Mota, and M. Makler, astro-ph/0511007 Astron. Astrophys., in press (2006); M.J. Rebougas and J.S. Alcaniz, astro-ph/0603206 Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc, in press (2006); M.J. Rebougas and J.S. Alcaniz, Braz. J. Phys. 35, 1062 (2005). [24] A.Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V.Pasquier, Phys. Lett. B 511, 265 (2001). [25] N. Bilic, G.B. Tupper and R.D. VioUier, Phys. Lett. B 535, 17 (2002). [26] M.C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A.A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 66, 043507 (2002); M.C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A.A. Sen, Phys. Lett. B 575, 172 (2003); M.C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A.A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 70, 083519 (2004). [27] M.C. Bento, O. Bertolami, M.J. Rebougas, and P.T. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 73, 043504 (2006). [28] C. Deffayet, G. DvaU and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 65, 044023 (2002). [29] C. Deffayet, S. J. Landau, J. Raux, M. Zaldarriaga and P. Astier, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024019 (2002). [30] D. J. H. Chung and K. Freese, Phys. Rev. D 61, 023511 (2000) . [31] P. Gondolo and K. Freese, Phys. Rev. D 68, 063509 (2003) . [32] A. A. Sen and S. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 68, 023513 (2003). [33] Y. G. Gong and C. K. Duan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 352, 847 (2004). [34] Z. H. Zhu, M. K. Fujimoto and X. T. He, Astrophys. J. 603, 365 (2004). [35] J.S. Alcaniz and N. Pires, Phys. Rev. D 70, 047303 (2004) . [36] O. Elgaroy and T. Multamaki, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 356, 475 (2005). [37] M. Fairbairn and A. Goobar, |astro-ph/0511029| [38] Zong-Kuan Guo, Zong-Hong Zhu, J.S. Alcaniz, and Yuan-Zhong Zhang, astro-ph/0603632 [39] U. Alam and V. Sahni, astro-ph/0511473 [40] J. L. Tonry et al. [Supernova Search Team Collaboration], Astrophys. J. 594, 1 (2003). [41] B. J. Barris et ai, Astrophys. J. 602, 571 (2004). [42] J. Dick, L. Knox and M. Chu, astro-ph/0603247 [43] G.I. Gomero, M.J. Rebougas, and R. Tavakol, Class. Quantum Grav. 18, 4461 (2001); G.I. Gomero, M.J. Re- bougas, and R. Tavakol, Class. Quantum Grav. 18, L145 (2001) ; G.I. Gomero, M.J. Rebougas, and R. Tavakol, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 4261 (2002); J.R. Weeks, R. Lehoucq, and J.P. Uzan, Class. Quantum Grav. 20, 1529 (2003); J.R. Weeks, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 18, 2099 (2003); G.I. Gomero and M.J. Rebougas, Phys. Lett. A 311, 319 (2003); B. Mota, M.J. Rebougas, and R. Tavakol, Class. Quantum Grav. 20, 4837 (2003). [44] N.J. Cornish, D.N. Spergel, G.D. Starkman, and E. Ko- matsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 201302 (2004). [45] B.F. Roukema et al., Astron. Astrophys. 423, 821 (2004). [46] J. Gundermann, astro-ph/0503014 [47] R. Aurich, S. Lustig, and F. Steiner, astro-p h/05l0847| [48] B. Mclnnes, Phys. Lett. B 593, 10 (2004 ). [49] http: / /cernlib.web.cern.ch/cernlib / down load/ 1 / 2004_source /tar/minuit32_src.tar.gz